Nessie is designed to work with table formats that support a write-once, immutable asset and metadata model. These types of formats rely on a transaction arbitrator to decide the order of operations within a table. Nessie developers have named this operation a “root pointer store” (or RPS). This is because these formats all have the same need of determining what is the “latest” version of data. This decision needs to be maintained via a check-and-set operation about what the current state of a table is.
Root Pointer Store¶
Each table format provides at least one RPS facility. Existing RPS models include:
- RPS by convention: E.g. “only one writer is allowed”
- RPS by consistent fileSystem: E.g. one file can be created with a certain name
- RPS by external locking: E.g. calling Hive Metastore lock apis
Nessie formalizes and extends the concept of an RPS. It adds two main types of operations: coordination of multiple per-table root pointers and historical versioning across changes. This allows users to combine the rich capabilities of existing table formats with the Nessie capabilities around versioning and transactions.
Nessie currently works with the following formats.
We expect that Nessie will continue to add table formats as more are created.
In addition to table formats, Nessie also supports storing Iceberg views within the Nessie repository. This allows tools working in tandem with Nessie to provide very powerful versioned, semantic-layering system. See more in our documentation on Iceberg Views.
Other Object Types¶
There has been discussion about adding additional types of objects to Nessie for the purpose of creating a consistent repository between input assets (jobs, models, etc.) and output assets. This is something that will be evaluated based on demand. There are currently three options being considered:
- more structured object types (such as Spark job)
- blob types
- support for git sub-modules (where Nessie offers a new object type that refers to a particular commit within a git repository)
If you have more thoughts on this, please provide feedback on the mailing list.